Skip to main content
· 2/14/2007

People v. Gargani

Citations

  • 863 N.E.2d 762
  • 309 Ill. Dec. 130
  • 371 Ill. App. 3d 729
  • 2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the trial court was revested with jurisdiction to hear an untimely posttrial motion where the State actively participated in the hearing without objecting to the untimeliness of the motion
  • finding the trial court was revested with jurisdiction to hear an untimely posttrial motion where the State actively participated in the hearing without objecting to the untimeliness of the motion
  • finding the trial court was revested with jurisdiction to hear an untimely posttrial motion where the State actively participated in the hearing without objecting to the untimeliness of the motion
  • “When considering the sufficiency of the evidence, a reviewing court does not retry the defendant.”
  • “When considering the sufficiency of the evidence, a reviewing court does not retry the defendant.”
  • the prosecutor's active participation in the hearing on the motion to reconsider sentence was inconsistent with the merits of the prior judgment because it was a tacit acknowledgment that the prior proceedings should be revisited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.