Skip to main content

People v. Lee

Citations

  • 821 N.E.2d 307
  • 213 Ill. 2d 218
  • 290 Ill. Dec. 256
  • 2004 Ill. LEXIS 2032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding if the State negates any element necessary to establish self-defense, the defense fails
  • armed robbery is a Class X felony, while aggravated robbery is a Class 1 felony
  • reiterates the Jeffries standards regarding self-defense and adds that “[i]f the State negates any one of these elements, the defendant’s claim of self-defense must fail”
  • armed robbery is a Class X felony, while aggravated robbery is a Class 1 felony
  • in deciding a self-defense claim, it is the function of the trier of fact to assess the credibility of the witnesses and resolve conflicts or inconsistencies in the evidence
  • “Self-defense is an affirmative defense, and once a defendant raises it, the State has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense, in addition to proving elements of the charged offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kilbride, Thomas, Garman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.