Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/18/2008
People v. Phillips
Citations
- 890 N.E.2d 1058
- 383 Ill. App. 3d 521
- 322 Ill. Dec. 139
- 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 601
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing claims that could be ascertained from the record (counsel's failure to request a jury instruction on a lesser included offense
- addressing claims that could be ascertained from the record (counsel’s failure to request a jury instruction on a lesser included offense
- claim of ineffective assistance of counsel requiring consideration of matters outside of the record is best resolved in a postconviction proceeding
- this court was “unpersuaded” when another defendant made the same argument that “the approach taken by the supreme court in Davis was too narrow”
- claim of ineffective assistance of counsel requiring consideration of matters outside of the record is best resolved in a postconviction proceeding
- involuntary manslaughter is not lesser included when the charging document does not contain a mental state when describing felony murder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greiman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. WatsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-01-25· cited 41×
- People v. McLaurinAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-12-10· cited 40×
- People v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-15· cited 36×
- People v. GroebeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-05-27· cited 31×
- In re Commitment of ButlerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-09-20· cited 27×
- People v. CottonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-07-20· cited 24×
- In re Commitment of DodgeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-05-02· cited 21×
- People v. ColbertAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-01-22· cited 14×
- People v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-12-10· cited 12×
- People v. McLaurinAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-06-16· cited 10×
- In re Dionte J.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-06-21· cited 10×
- People v. CampbellAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-09-24· cited 9×
- In re Commitment of AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-07-11· cited 7×
- People v. ShaferAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-11-04· cited 6×
- People v. VergileSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands· 2008-11-13· cited 1×
- People v. JacobsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-11-01
Cites
61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-02-11· cited 3,273×
- People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-19· cited 1,967×
- People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-10-26· cited 566×
- People v. KlinerIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-12-03· cited 564×
- People v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-02-16· cited 553×
- People v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 466×
- People v. NovakIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-09-22· cited 347×
- People v. RodriguezIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-01-18· cited 301×
- People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-10-18· cited 269×
- People v. McDonaldIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-10-19· cited 265×
- People v. ChildsIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-05-19· cited 244×
- People v. ViserIllinois Supreme Court· 1975-09-26· cited 183×
- Heastie v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-11-01· cited 177×
- People v. HobleyIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-03-31· cited 165×
- People v. KoltonIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-03-23· cited 161×
- People v. CejaIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-04-17· cited 145×
- People v. BishopIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-01-20· cited 138×
- People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-05-22· cited 130×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.