Skip to main content

People v. Arroyo

Citations

  • 3 Misc. 3d 668
  • 777 N.Y.S.2d 836
  • 2004 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that New York statute, worded similarly to § 53-247 (a), that prohibits \unjustifiably injur[ing]\ animals was unconstitutionally vague as applied to defendant who chose not to provide veterinary care to terminally ill dog

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torres

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.