Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1/30/2018
State v. Josephs
Citations
- 176 A.3d 542
- 328 Conn. 21
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that ‘‘[a] statute is ambiguous if, when read in context, [it] is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- reciting facts that trial court reasonably could have found on basis of evidence presented at trial
- in construing statutes, ‘‘[w]e are not permitted to supply statutory language that the legislature may have chosen to omit’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- in construing statutes, ‘‘[w]e are not permitted to supply statutory language that the legislature may have chosen to omit’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Auria, McDonald, Palmer, Robinson, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Borelli v. RenaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-06-24· cited 24×
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-09-24· cited 23×
- State v. Roy D. L.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-07-28· cited 23×
- Independent Party of CT-State Central v. MerrillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-02-19· cited 18×
- State v. Lori T.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-10-18· cited 8×
- State v. StephensonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-08-31· cited 7×
- State v. SchimanskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-08-23· cited 3×
- State v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-11-04· cited 3×
- State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-08-03· cited 2×
- Northland Investment Corp. v. Public Utilities Regulatory AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-05-07· cited 2×
- State v. OverstreetConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-04-29· cited 1×
- State v. DojniaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-06-04
- Borelli v. RenaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-02-16
- State v. MarcusConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-11-11
- State v. ValleConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-12-23
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-04-05· cited 150×
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-09-28· cited 92×
- Vaillancourt v. New Britain Machine/LittonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-01-12· cited 84×
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-04-26· cited 80×
- State v. WinotSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-02-16· cited 69×
- Johnson v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1840-07-15· cited 37×
- State v. WilchinskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-29· cited 34×
- State Ex Rel. Gregan v. KoczurSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-06-03· cited 25×
- Soucy v. WysockiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-03-31· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. SzewczykMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2016-07-14· cited 6×
- People v. ArroyoCriminal Court of the City of New York· 2004-03-04· cited 5×
- Bartlett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-24· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.