Appellate Court of Illinois· 10/23/2001

People v. Anderson

Citations

759 N.E.2d 83
325 Ill. App. 3d 624
259 Ill. Dec. 603
2001 Ill. App. LEXIS 821

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“a court is not required to give the defendant’s rehabilitative potential more weight than the seriousness of the offense”
“[N]o party may raise on appeal the failure to give any instruction unless he tendered it to the court.”
“consecutive sentencing does not increase any of defendant’s individual sentences for an offense beyond the statutory maximum, but determines the manner in which those sentences will be served”
“consecutive sentencing does not increase any of defendant’s individual sentences for an offense beyond the statutory maximum, but determines the manner in which those sentences will be served.”
“consecutive sentencing does not increase any of defendant’s individual sentences for an offense beyond the statutory maximum, but determines the manner in which those sentences will be served”
“consecutive sentencing does not increase any of defendant’s individual sentences for an offense beyond the statutory maximum, but determines the manner in which those sentences will be served”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Myerscough, Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.