People v. Wittenmyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the imposition of sentences for multiple nontriggering offenses which ran concurrent to one another but consecutive to a single sentence for a triggering offense
• upholding the imposition of sentences for multiple nontriggering offenses which ran concurrent to one another but consecutive to a single sentence for a triggering offense
• circumstances in which consecutive sentences are mandatory are exceptions to the general rule prohibiting such sentences when the offenses are committed as part of a single course of conduct
• out of court statements to a police detective by a minor sex abuse victim properly admitted where the victim’s answers were primarily in her own words and nothing in the record indicated that the interviews were threatening or coercive
• out of court statements to a police detective by a minor sex abuse victim properly admitted where the victim’s answers were primarily in her own words and nothing in the record indicated that the interviews were threatening or coercive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).