PEOPLE EX REL. ANGLE v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, as with statutory interpretation, a constitutional provision's plain language controls
• explaining that this court interprets unambiguous language \in accordance with its plain meaning\
• \[T]he interpretation of a statute or constitutional provision will be harmonized with other statutes or provisions.\
• “[W]hen possible, the interpretation of a statute or constitutional prevision will be harmonized with other statutes or provisions to avoid unreasonable or absurd results.”
• party seeking writ relief carries the burden to show that the district court committed such a manifest abuse of discretion that would warrant this court's extraordinary and discretionary intervention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).