Nevada State Bank v. Jamison Family Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a timely action does not toll the running of statute of limitations for compulsory counterclaims
• holding that a timely action does not toll the running of statute of limitations for compulsory counterclaims
• providing that the statute of limitation commences to run when the claimant knew or reasonably should have known of the facts underpinning the claim
• reasoning that a party could raise an affirmative defense despite the statute of limitations based on equitable considerations
• reasoning that a party could raise an affirmative defense despite the statute of limitations based on equitable considerations
• stating that a “statute of limitation[s] will not commence to run until the aggrieved party knew, or reasonably should have known, of the facts giving rise to the breach”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).