Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Arizona Supreme Court· 5/4/1942

Whitman v. Moore

Citations

  • 125 P.2d 445
  • 59 Ariz. 211
  • 1942 Ariz. LEXIS 163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • examining statutory and constitutional signature requirements as well as the purpose behind those requirements
  • finding substantial compliance when more signatures were included on petitions than allowed by statute; some addresses were written by someone other than the signer or indicated only by ditto marks; and circulators did not include their cities and state, but did include their addresses
  • absence of circulator's certificate \requires that the names should be stricken in the absence of affirmative evidence that those signing were qualified electors.\
  • absence of circulator’s certificate “requires that the names should be stricken in the absence of affirmative evidence that those signing were qualified electors.”
  • overruled with respect to another point only in Renck v. Superior Court, 66 Ariz. 320, 187 P.2d 656 (1947)
  • overruled with respect to another point only in Renck v. Superior Court, 66 Ariz. 320, 187 P.2d 656 (1947)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockwood, McALISTER, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.