· 10/8/1991
Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court
Citations
- 818 P.2d 849
- 107 Nev. 674
- 1991 Nev. LEXIS 159
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition
- recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition
- recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition
- recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition
- recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition
- recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rose, Steffen, Young, McGee, Breen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.