Steinhardt v. Rudolph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unconscionability claim may exist only \against the enforceability of such leases\
• rejecting procedural-substantive analysis as a rule of law but noting that it is “generally helpful”
• defining contractual unconscionability as a contract or clause that no sensible person would make and no fair person would accept; also restating that the courts should consider unconscionability based on a balancing test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).