Eleventh Circuit· 4/29/2019
Galawezh Showan v. Patrick Pressdee
Citations
- 922 F.3d 1211
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Rule 11 does not conflict with the Georgia frivolous litigation statute and applying the law
- stating that the district court erred when it ruled that a 12 “unit-of-time argument was not allowable under the law” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- finding that testimony concerning billing practices “did not violate the collateral source rule” because the testimony “addressed the reasonableness” of medical expenses and whether such expenses are “reasonable and necessary” is a critical inquiry under Georgia law
- explaining that under Georgia law, which provides the substantive rules for this diversity case, “a tort victim is entitled to recover medical expenses arising from his injuries, including hospital charges, that [are] reasonable and necessary” (quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pryor, Branch, Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- ECB USA, Inc. v. Chubb Insurance Company of New JerseyEleventh Circuit· 2024-08-29· cited 13×
- Mittie Anglin v. Stephanie SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-01-05
- Beach Tv Properties Inc. v. SolomanDistrict of Columbia· 2022-01-29
- Birch REA Partners, Inc. v. Regent BankSeventh Circuit· 2022-03-02
- ECB USA, Inc. v. Chubb Insurance Company of New JerseyEleventh Circuit· 2024-08-01
- Michael T. Smith as Administrator of the Estate of Ashley Amanda Claxton v. Dale AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2026-02-12
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 4,586×
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,853×
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 1,115×
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 848×
- Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court· 2010-03-31· cited 619×
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-01-10· cited 570×
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. WoodsSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 373×
- Anderson v. YungkauSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 274×
- PTA-FLA, Inc. v. ZTE USA, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2016-12-15· cited 197×
- Tammy Burke, Royal Insurance Company, Linda Burke Daniels, Plaintiff-Third-Party v. John Smith, Heyl Truck Lines, Inc., Defendants-Third-PartyThird Circuit· 2001-05-31· cited 182×
- Thermoset Corporation v. Building Materials Corp of AmericaEleventh Circuit· 2017-03-02· cited 179×
- Davide M. Carbone v. Cable News Network, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2018-12-13· cited 127×
- Fmc Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Victoria Varonos, Cross-Appellee v. Continental Illinois National Bank, Garnishee-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1990-01-11· cited 118×
- People of Sioux County v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court· 1928-02-20· cited 112×
- Steve Rossbach v. City of MiamiEleventh Circuit· 2004-06-07· cited 102×
- Pendergast v. Sprint Nextel Corp.Eleventh Circuit· 2010-01-04· cited 101×
- Proctor v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2007-08-13· cited 86×
- Hardwick v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1966-12-16· cited 66×
- Baron Tube Company, the Partnership of Hyman Baron and Jay Baron and Hyman Baron, Individually v. The Transport Insurance CompanyFifth Circuit· 1966-08-03· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.