Penaloza v. Drummond Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a “once removed” command theory was “simply too attenuated to support liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.
  Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 8,668×
• Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-29· cited 1,133×
• GJR Investments, Inc. v. County of Escambia
  Eleventh Circuit· 1998-01-05· cited 1,132×
• Brooks v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1997-03-11· cited 728×
• Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2016-01-25· cited 660×
• Joe Marsh, Leroy Owens v. Butler County, Alabama, the Butler County Commission
  Eleventh Circuit· 2001-09-26· cited 602×
• Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Company
  Eleventh Circuit· 2009-08-11· cited 452×
• Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
  Supreme Court· 2013-04-17· cited 438×
• Oxford Asset Mgmt. Ltd. v. Michael Jaharis
  Eleventh Circuit· 2002-07-16· cited 391×
• Halberstam v. Welch
  D.C. Circuit· 1983-04-12· cited 277×
• Roger Justice v. United States
  Eleventh Circuit· 1993-11-15· cited 274×
• Vietnam Ass'n for Victims of Agent Orange v. Dow Chemical Co.
  Second Circuit· 2008-02-22· cited 248×
• Romero v. Drummond Co., Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2008-12-22· cited 215×
• Donato Dalrymple v. Janet Reno
  Eleventh Circuit· 2003-06-19· cited 200×
• Aldana v. Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2005-07-08· cited 200×
• Rayburn v. Hogue
  Eleventh Circuit· 2001-02-28· cited 156×
• Elsa Cabello v. Armando Fernandez-Larios
  Eleventh Circuit· 2005-03-14· cited 134×
• Kane Enterprises v. MacGregor (USA) Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2003-02-27· cited 108×