Skip to main content

Pelts v. Pelts

Citations

  • 2017 Ark. 98
  • 514 S.W.3d 455
  • 2017 Ark. LEXIS 83

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • retirement benefit ‘‘contingent on continued employment is too speculative to be vested and subject to division’’
  • retirement benefit ‘‘contingent on continued employment is too speculative to be vested and subject to division’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shawn A. Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.