Brown v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaffirming holding that postmarital enhancement in pension benefits may be marital in nature
• reaffirming holding that postmarital enhancement in pension benefits may be marital in nature
• “The ‘time rule’ formula has been approved by a number of jurisdictions.” (citing Cooper v. Cooper, 167 Ariz. 482, 808 P.2d 1234, 1242 (1990)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Skelton v. Skelton
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-11-18· cited 25×
• Pelts v. Pelts
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2017-03-16· cited 8×
• Smith v. Henley
  Superior Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-12-15· cited 3×
• Opinion No.
  Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 1998-06-26

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Hunt
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-12-18· cited 325×
• Hare v. Hodgins
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1991-09-09· cited 113×
• Gemma v. Gemma
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1989-08-23· cited 29×
• Askins v. Askins
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-03-10· cited 27×
• Young v. Young
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-01-13· cited 26×
• Elcare, Inc. v. Gocio
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-01-28· cited 22×
• Sutton v. Sutton
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1989-06-14· cited 16×
• Marriage of Stoerkel v. Stoerkel
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-06-17· cited 15×
• DaCosse v. Ahrens
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1981-06-03· cited 2×
• Brown v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1992-04-29· cited 2×