Payne v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, as a matter of law, that the defendant's conduct was not lewd, lascivious, vulgar, or indecent
• holding, as a matter of law, that the defendant’s conduct was not lewd, lascivious, vulgar, or indecent
• holding the act of urinating in public does not by itself constitute a lewd or lascivious act
• the decision suggests, expressly, that the charge of disorderly conduct would have been appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Egal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-22· cited 28×
• M.L.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-02· cited 5×
• Durant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-08· cited 3×
• Burks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-18· cited 2×
• Andrews v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-04· cited 1×
• MLC v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-02
• State v. Sachs
  Broward County Court· 1985-06-12

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chesebrough v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-12-08· cited 100×
• Goodmakers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-11· cited 20×