Durant v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence failed to prove wicked, lustful, unchaste intent on part of defendant who urinated off his back steps one evening, allegedly knowing that teenage girls were outside and would see him; circumstances must show a lewd or lascivious intent
• reversing the defendant’s conviction for a lewd or lascivious act when the circumstances did not demonstrate a “wicked, lustful, unchaste, licentious, or sensual design on the part of the perpetrator” (quoting Egal, 469 So.2d at 197)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• M.L.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-02· cited 5×
• Burks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-18· cited 2×
• MLC v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-02

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Egal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-22· cited 28×
• Payne v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-26· cited 9×