Goodmakers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court erred in denying motion to dismiss, and noting that, while motion was sworn to by counsel, not the defendant, deficiency had been waived by State’s failure to object
• “[I]n order for there to be a violation of section 800.03, there must be, coupled with mere nudity, ‘lascivious’ exposition or exhibition of the defendant’s sexual organs.”
• “Hence, in order for there to be a violation of section 800.03, there must be, coupled with mere nudity, ‘lascivious’ exposition or exhibition of the defendant’s sexual organs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).