Egal v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “lewd and lascivious conduct is not limited to acts involving physical contact, threat thereof or manifested desire therefor”
• affirming where naked defendant answered the door, took an order form from a girl scout, went inside, and reappeared at the door still naked
• stating “current standards have not changed to the point that total nudity is considered to be normally acceptable behavior. To intentionally expose one’s private parts to a young child is hardly accepted conduct.”
• stating \current standards have not changed to the point that total nudity is considered to be normally acceptable behavior. To intentionally expose one's private parts to a young child is hardly accepted conduct.\
• “'[I]f forty years ago either a man or a woman had donned.the apparel popular on our beaches today . . . such person would probably have been . . . branded as a lewd, lascivious, and indecent person’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).