Skip to main content

Patel v. Soriano

Citations

  • 848 A.2d 803
  • 369 N.J. Super. 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Interference by falsehoods that cause pecuniary loss, but are not personally defamatory, has been regarded as a tort more or less distinct from defamation.”
  • trade libel claim asserted by a doctor for disparagement of his ability to practice medicine
  • “We look to federal jurisprudence to guide our interpretation of the [New Jersey Antitrust] Act.”
  • “The communication must be made to a third person and must play a material part in inducing others not to deal with plaintiff.”
  • plaintiff must prove “special damages,” and the “necessary showing is specific: plaintiff must establish pecuniary loss that has been realized or liquidated such 23 as lost sales, or the loss of prospective contracts with customers.”
  • “Recovery for emotional distress under this cause of action is barred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Carchman, Wecker and Weissbard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.