Skip to main content
· 5/3/1993

Williams v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.

Citations

  • 623 A.2d 234
  • 132 N.J. 109
  • 1993 N.J. LEXIS 83

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant \waived the statute-of-limitations defense by its failure to assert that defense at any stage of the proceedings after pleading the statute in its [a]nswer.\
  • holding that the defendant \waived the statute-of-limitations defense by its failure to assert that defense at any stage of the proceedings after pleading the statute in its [a]nswer.\
  • observing that litigant in that case “had waived the statute-of-limitations defense by its failure to assert that defense at any stage of the proceedings after pleading the statute in its Answer”
  • observing that litigant in that case \had waived the statute-of-limitations defense by its failure to assert that defense at any stage of the proceedings after pleading the statute in its [a]nswer\
  • referring to its decision in Lawrence v. Bauer Publishing & Printing Ltd., 78 N.J. 371, 396 A.2d 569 (1979)
  • finding waiver when defendant raised statute-of-limitations defense in answer but took no other measures to preserve defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.