Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/17/1985
Partain v. State
Citations
- 492 A.2d 669
- 63 Md. App. 260
- 1985 Md. App. LEXIS 405
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that cunnilingus constitutes both “sexual act” and “sexual contact”
- not inconsistent for jury to conclude that the separate incidents of the same type of sexual activity constitute individual second and third degree sexual offenses
- not inconsistent for jury to conclude that the separate incidents of the same type of sexual activity constitute individual second and third degree sexual offenses
- cunnilingus does not require penetration of the genitals
- penetration is not necessary to show cunnilingus
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Love v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-03-22· cited 65×
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-12-09· cited 62×
- State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-05-15· cited 57×
- Horton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1998-04-17· cited 49×
- Rafael Larios-Reyes v. Loretta LynchFourth Circuit· 2016-12-06· cited 18×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-01· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. BenoitMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-12-08· cited 9×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 1,306×
- Andresen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-10· cited 153×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-31· cited 113×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-12-06· cited 83×
- Langley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-11-02· cited 58×
- Salmon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-12-06· cited 50×
- Bradbury v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-01-30· cited 33×
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-04-15· cited 31×
- In Re a Special Investigation No. 228Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-04-07· cited 27×
- Piles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-02-06· cited 17×
- Canter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-03-16· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.