Skip to main content

Love v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 441 S.E.2d 709
  • 18 Va. App. 84
  • 10 Va. Law Rep. 1087
  • 1994 Va. App. LEXIS 144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that thirteen-year-old victim’s seven-year delay in reporting ongoing sexual abuse did not render her testimony inherently incredible
  • holding that thirteen-year-old victim’s seven-year delay in reporting ongoing sexual abuse did not render her testimony inherently incredible
  • holding that 13-year-old victim’s 7-year delay in reporting ongoing sexual abuse did not render her testimony inherently incredible
  • holding that the victim’s seven-year delay in reporting abuse did not render her testimony inherently incredible
  • holding that a seven-year delay in reporting did not render the victim’s testimony inherently incredible
  • holding that a 13-year-old victim’s 7-year delay in reporting ongoing sexual abuse did not render her testimony inherently incredible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.