Court of Appeals of Virginia· 9/23/2008

Parks v. Parks

Citations

666 S.E.2d 547
52 Va. App. 663
2008 Va. App. LEXIS 437

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an issue may be treated as waived if a party’s failure to follow Rule 5A:20(e) is significant
refusing to consider assignments of error where appellant did not present any legal authority to support her assignments of error
applying Jay to hold that the appellant’s claims of error were waived and affirming the decision “without opinion as to whether error exist[ed] in the record”
treating “a question presented as waived[]” where appellant’s “‘failure to strictly adhere to the requirements of Rule 5A:20(e)’ is significant” (quoting Jay v. Commonwealth, 275 Va. 510, 520 (2008))
“[W]hen a party’s ‘failure to strictly adhere to the requirements of Rule 5A:20(e)’ is significant, ‘the Court of Appeals may . . . treat a question presented as waived.’”
“[W]hen a party’s ‘failure to strictly adhere to the requirements of Rule 5A:20(e)’ is significant, ‘the Court of Appeals may . . . treat a question presented as waived.’” (second alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Felton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Parks v. Parks

56 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.