Skip to main content

Wilson v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 681 S.E.2d 74
  • 54 Va. App. 631
  • 2009 Va. App. LEXIS 363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that it was error for the circuit court to find that it did not have jurisdiction when the defendant had “not yet transferred to the Department of Corrections” (emphasis added)
  • noting in cases of first impression that appellants are not required to “cite to cases where no precedent exists or to cite a set number of cases or code sections”
  • “Unsupported assertions of error ‘do not merit appellate consideration.’” (quoting Jones v. Commonwealth, 51 Va. App. 730, 734 (2008))
  • Code § 19.2‑303 only applicable if the defendant presents trial court with “circumstances in mitigation of the offense.”
  • Code § 19.2‑303 only applicable if the defendant presents trial court with “circumstances in mitigation of the offense.”
  • “Pursuant to [Rule 5A:20], we have held that ‘[u]nsupported assertions of error do not merit appellate consideration.’” (quoting Jones v. Commonwealth, 51 Va. App. 730, 734, 660 S.E.2d 343, 345 (2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert J. Humphreys

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.