William Rand Barnes v. Lucille F. Barnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[s]tatements unsupported by argument, authority, or citations to the record do not merit appellate consideration” (alteration in original) (emphasis omitted) (quoting Buchanan v. Buchanan, 14 Va. App. 53, 56 (1992))
• observing that “[s]tatements unsupported by . . . authority[] or citation[] to the record do not merit appellate consideration” and the Court “will not search the record . . . [to] correct [such] deficiencies” (first alteration in original) (emphasis omitted
• refusing to consider an appellant’s argument that “relies on broad and conclusory assertions without a single citation to any controlling legal authority”
• considering “evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the plaintiff whose evidence was struck” in a material change in circumstances case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).