Jay v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 5A:20 is not a jurisdictional requirement mandating the dismissal of an appeal
• holding that the Court of Appeals may not dismiss on jurisdictional grounds appeals that fail to comply with the requirement of Rules 5A:12(c) and 5A:20(e
• holding that the Court of Appeals may not dismiss on jurisdictional grounds appeals that fail to comply with the requirement of Rules 5A:12(c) and 5A:20(e
• holding that noncompliance with the requirements of Rule 5A:20(e) does not deprive this Court of active jurisdiction
• holding that this Court “may treat a question presented as waived” if a party fails to adhere to the requirements of Rule 5A:20
• holding that the Court of Appeals may not dismiss on jurisdictional grounds appeals that fail to comply with the requirement of Rules 5A:12(c) and 5A:20(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).