Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1/27/2005
Parker v. State
Citations
- 866 A.2d 885
- 160 Md. App. 672
- 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding case to circuit court to determine if convictions affected length of subsequent federal sentence
- “[A] guilty plea must be knowing and intelligent, i.e., it is subject to the Johnson v. Zerbst standard.”
- under Rule 4-242, before plea agreement can be entered, court must determine that plea underlying the agreement is knowing, voluntary, and factually supported
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panel Eyler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-09-21· cited 29×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-13· cited 29×
- Abrams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-09-10· cited 18×
- Graves v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-18· cited 17×
- Gross v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-11· cited 11×
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-01· cited 8×
- In Re Blessen H.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-06-30· cited 6×
- State v. DENISYUKCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-29· cited 6×
- Bodeau v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-10-01· cited 2×
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-29
- Davis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-09-03
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 1,618×
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court· 1954-02-08· cited 1,436×
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 1,174×
- Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. BouknightSupreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 154×
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-01-16· cited 134×
- Madison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-23· cited 84×
- Skok v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-10-10· cited 75×
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-01-19· cited 51×
- State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-04-08· cited 35×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-03· cited 34×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-03-12· cited 30×
- James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-04-29· cited 30×
- Barnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-30· cited 20×
- State v. ThorntonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-12-02· cited 19×
- Wyche v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-01-05· cited 15×
- In Re Maurice M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-12-19· cited 14×
- State v. HicksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-05· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.