State v. Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a coram nobis proceeding is a civil proceeding and consequently “the State is not limited to the circumstances described in CJ § 12 — 302(c)”
• “Because a petition for a writ of coram nobis is a civil proceeding, the State is not limited to the circumstances described in CJ § 12-302(c).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rice, Nero, Miller White & Goodson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-05-20· cited 17×
• Parker v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-27· cited 14×
• State v. WBAL-TV
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-17· cited 10×
• Rich v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-11-01· cited 5×
• Pitt v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-09· cited 4×
• Rich v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-08-30
• Griffin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-29
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-08-15

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Morgan
  Supreme Court· 1954-02-08· cited 1,436×
• Skok v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-10-10· cited 75×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-07-07· cited 62×
• Ruby v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-22· cited 34×
• James v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-04-29· cited 30×