Arizona Supreme Court· 4/27/1995
PAM TRANSPORT v. Freightliner Corp.
Citations
- 893 P.2d 1295
- 182 Ariz. 132
- 189 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
- 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 43
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]f a statute specifies under what conditions it is effective, we can ordinarily infer that it excludes all others.”
- “[I]f a statute specifies under what conditions it is effective, we can ordinarily infer that it excludes all others.”
- “[I]f a statute specifies under what conditions it is effective, we can ordinarily infer that it excludes all others.”
- “[I]f a statute specifies under what conditions it is effective, we can ordinarily infer that it excludes all others.”
- “[I]f a statute specifies under what conditions it is effective, we can ordinarily infer that it excludes all others.”
- “[W]e attempt to give ‘meaningful operation’ to all provisions of a statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zlaket, Feldman, Moeller, Corcoran, Martone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-08-22· cited 67×
- Herstam v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-04-11· cited 19×
- Boynton v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-04-08· cited 16×
- Arizona State Democratic Party v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-09-30· cited 10×
- Bill Alexander Ford, Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Casa Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-08-13· cited 7×
- Bishop v. PecanicCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-07-28· cited 5×
- Cemex Construction Materials South, LLC v. Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-04-30· cited 3×
- BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Wildwood Creek Ranch, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-01-16· cited 2×
- PAM Transport v. Freightliner Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1995-06-09· cited 1×
- Pam Transport v. Freightliner CorporationNinth Circuit· 1995-06-09
- FAYE HOELZ v. ANDREA LEGATH BOWERS, M.D. v. LUTHERAN CROSSINGS ENHANCED LIVING (L-0620-16, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2022-06-20
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court· 1991-02-28· cited 148×
- Dietz v. General Electric Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-11-21· cited 67×
- City of Tucson v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1990-09-18· cited 26×
- State v. AllredArizona Supreme Court· 1967-03-29· cited 24×
- Parker v. VanellArizona Supreme Court· 1992-01-21· cited 12×
Other cases named PAM TRANSPORT v. Freightliner Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.