FAYE HOELZ v. ANDREA LEGATH BOWERS, M.D. v. LUTHERAN CROSSINGS ENHANCED LIVING (L-0620-16, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Commerce has authority to determine most similar merchan dise and methodology used
• remanding because Commerce “failed to adequately articulate the reasons for its departure from its normal practice”
• requiring remand on the ground that Commerce “failed to adequately articulate the reasons for its departure from its normal practice”
• using “traditional methodology” and “normal practice” in relation to prior norm
• ordering remand to correct for possible double counting of credit expense
• “It is ‘a general rule that an agency must either conform itself to its prior decisions or explain ... its departure.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).