· 2/7/1991
City of Tucson v. Superior Court
Citations
- 809 P.2d 428
- 167 Ariz. 513
- 79 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 9
- 1991 Ariz. LEXIS 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding special action jurisdiction properly accepted when “issue presented is a pure issue of law that is of statewide significance”
- finding acceptance of special action jurisdiction appropriate when \issue presented is a pure issue of law that is of statewide significance\
- finding acceptance of special action jurisdiction appropriate when “issue presented is a pure issue of law that is of statewide significance”
- finding special action jurisdiction properly accepted when “issue presented is a pure issue of law that is of statewide significance”
- finding acceptance of special action jurisdiction appropriate when “issue presented is a pure issue of law that is of statewide significance”
- special-action jurisdiction appropriate when issue presented is “a pure issue of law that is of statewide significance”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Cameron, Moeller, Corcoran, Brooks, Feldman, Ariz, Const
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.