Boynton v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding legislature did not intend to incorporate statutory provision into a related statute when it “could have ... but decided not to” amend statutory language to include such provision
• striking DCAC designation of a conviction for an offense not found within DCAC, but affirming an enhanced sentence where the underlying offense statute incorporated the DCAC enhanced sentencing scheme
• “Although luring a minor for sexual exploitation is not a ‘dangerous crime against children,’ the legislature has prescribed that it is punishable in accordance with § 13-604.01(1
• “Although luring a minor for sexual exploitation is not a ‘dangerous crime against children,’ the legislature has prescribed that it is punishable in accordance with [§ 13-705] under certain circumstances, i.e. when the minor is under fifteen years of age.”
• “Although luring a minor for sexual exploitation is not a ‘dangerous crime against children,’ the legislature has prescribed that it is punishable in accordance with § 13-604.01(1) under certain circumstances, i.e. when the minor is under fifteen years of age.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).