Skip to main content
· 11/10/2015

Gerard Brady v. Cumberland County

Citations

  • 2015 ME 143
  • 126 A.3d 1145
  • 40 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1459
  • 2015 Me. LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework is not applicable to MWPA retaliation cases on summary judgment
  • requiring the plaintiff to show “the adverse employment action was motivated at least in part by retaliatory intent”
  • finding sufficient circumstantial evidence that decisionmaker knew of protected activity where employee who received complaint “reported to” decisionmaker
  • a plaintiff must present \evidence that the adverse employment action was motivated at least in part by retaliatory intent\
  • abandoning McDonnell Douglas framework in MHRA retaliation case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.