Washington Supreme Court· 5/29/1997
Palmer v. Jensen
Citations
- 132 Wash. 2d 193
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding jury was justified in failing to award general damages to child who presented unchallenged evidence that he suffered minimal pain for a short period of time
- \Passing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to merit judicial consideration.\
- affirming jury’s denial of general damages where injuries were “minimal” and plaintiff required virtually no medical care
- criticizing Court of Appeals for “limit[ing] its analysis to whether the verdict was so inadequate as to indicate passion or prejudice . . . [without first addressing] whether there was evidence to support the verdict”
- upholding a jury’s verdict awarding only special damages of $34 to a car accident victim for the cost of a medical office visit when the record showed that his injuries were minimal and that he required no further medical care
- “the court can assume the jury failed to award damages for pain and suffering where the verdict is equal to or less than uncontroverted special damages”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dolliver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 119×
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 113×
- Palmer v. JensenWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-29· cited 88×
- Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2008-09-04· cited 88×
- State v. MarintorresCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-01-08· cited 77×
- Bunch v. King County Department of Youth ServicesWashington Supreme Court· 2005-07-21· cited 69×
- Bunch v. KING COUNTY DEPT. OF YOUTH SERV.Washington Supreme Court· 2005-07-21· cited 65×
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Gregg Roofing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-12-31· cited 59×
- Stephens v. Omni Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-04-23· cited 56×
- Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. PLATEAU 44Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-07-23· cited 52×
- Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. Plateau 44 II, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-07-23· cited 51×
- Lian v. StalickCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-19· cited 45×
- State v. ModicaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-12-26· cited 43×
- Johnson v. MermisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-05-18· cited 41×
- Locke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 36×
- Millies v. LandAmerica TransnationWashington Supreme Court· 2016-03-31· cited 33×
- Behnke v. AhrensCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-12-10· cited 33×
- Sommer v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-01-08· cited 30×
- Hoskins v. ReichCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-01-08· cited 28×
- Green v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-11-09· cited 28×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1993-09-16· cited 618×
- Palmer v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-04-05· cited 97×
- Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1967-01-05· cited 81×
- Baxter v. Greyhound Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1964-12-31· cited 62×
- Wooldridge v. WoolettWashington Supreme Court· 1981-12-31· cited 54×
- Krivanek v. Fibreboard Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-13· cited 43×
- McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court· 1954-12-02· cited 28×
- Shaw v. BrowningWashington Supreme Court· 1961-12-07· cited 26×
- Lanegan v. CraufordWashington Supreme Court· 1956-12-05· cited 25×
- Ide v. StoltenowWashington Supreme Court· 1955-11-17· cited 23×
- Hills v. KingWashington Supreme Court· 1965-08-19· cited 15×
- Cleva v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court· 1968-09-19· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.