Skip to main content
· 1/5/1967

Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.

Citations

  • 422 P.2d 515
  • 70 Wash. 2d 173
  • 1967 Wash. LEXIS 1045

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting substantial evidence review respects the jury’s prerogative to evaluate and weigh evidence
  • no new trial where causation element highly disputed because plaintiff had been in numerous collisions in the few years leading up to the disputed accident
  • the law strongly presumes the adequacy of the verdict
  • the law strongly presumes the adequacy of the verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.