Indiana Court of Appeals· 2/25/2009
Pallett v. State
Citations
- 901 N.E.2d 611
- 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 331
- 2009 WL 485114
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Meeker did not apply because the Parole Board did not use the term “turn over” and did not show an intent to discharge the sentence
- distinguishing Meeker based on the fact Pallett’s Parole Board in did not use the term “turn over”
- an offender may be on parole for one offense while serving a consecutive sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Baldi v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-06-29· cited 8×
- Samuel L. Hobbs, Jr. v. Keith ButtsIndiana Court of Appeals· 2017-08-31· cited 5×
- Charles Freeland v. Keith Butts (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-05-03
- Bennie Hale v. Keith ButtsIndiana Court of Appeals· 2017-11-28
- Frederick A. Young v. Keith Butts and Indiana Parole Board (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-03-06
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mills v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-01-10· cited 31×
- Meeker v. Indiana Parole BoardIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-08-29· cited 18×
- Parker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-02-15· cited 14×
- State v. MetcalfIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-15· cited 8×
- Murphy Breeding Laboratory, Inc. v. West Central Conservancy DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-08· cited 5×
- Borovilos Restaurant Corp. II v. Lutheran University Ass'n, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.