Skip to main content

Pallett v. State

Citations

  • 901 N.E.2d 611
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 331
  • 2009 WL 485114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Meeker did not apply because the Parole Board did not use the term “turn over” and did not show an intent to discharge the sentence
  • distinguishing Meeker based on the fact Pallett’s Parole Board in did not use the term “turn over”
  • an offender may be on parole for one offense while serving a consecutive sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.