Baldi v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sentence was not discharged where there was no use of the phrase “turn over” or expression of intent to discharge the sentence
• holding that because there was no evidence that the Parole Board ever used the term “turn over” or expressed an intent to discharge the sentence, the sentence was not discharged
• “The purpose of the writ of habeas corpus is to bring the person in custody before the court for inquiry into the cause of restraint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).