Skip to main content

Parker v. State

Citations

  • 822 N.E.2d 285
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 215
  • 2005 WL 351330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Meeker was distinguishable because the petitioner presented no evidence that the parole board discharged or \turned over\ the sentence
  • holding that the parole board properly reinstated the balance of the defendant’s sentence when it revoked his parole because there was no 3 This section of the Indiana Code has since been repealed. 6 evidence that it had ever discharged or “turned over” his sentence
  • distinguishing Meeker because evidence submitted by Parker did not contain the term “turn over” or similar language
  • petitioner presented no evidence that Parole Board discharged or “turned over” the sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Darden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.