Skip to main content

Mills v. State

Citations

  • 840 N.E.2d 354
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 13
  • 2006 WL 44343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an offender may be partially serving his parole for one offense while serving another sentence
  • addressing similar claims as post-conviction claims and noting that, in some instances, our post-conviction rules provide an alternative or additional remedy
  • involving Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 20A-PC-949 | December 31, 2020 Page 11 of 13 circumstances where a person was on parole while serving a consecutive sentence
  • considering merits of petitioner’s claim that his parole was improperly revoked
  • “[e]ven though Mills’s consecutive sentences were from unrelated convictions while the consecutive sentences in Hannis were from a single judgment, we conclude that the principles enunciated in Hannis apply”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Darden, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.