Skip to main content
· 12/5/1995

Artmatic USA Cosmetics v. Maybelline Co.

Citations

  • 906 F. Supp. 850
  • 38 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1037
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18564
  • 1995 WL 716283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Recent decisions in the Supreme Court and Second Circuit have made it clear that vacatur should not be granted as a matter of course.”
  • “The majority view is that collateral estoppel based on default judgments is undesirable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.