J.P.T. Automotive, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a court in reviewing specific objections to an R & R will not consider arguments that “could have been but [were] not, presented to the magistrate judge in the first instance”
• reviewing report and recommendation for clear error where objections “consist[ed] of nothing more than reiterating its original arguments . . . coupled with a few general or conclusory allegations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).