Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/13/2005
Page v. State
Citations
- 615 S.E.2d 740
- 364 S.C. 632
- 2005 S.C. LEXIS 178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding any possible civil commitment pursuant to the SVP Act does not flow directly from a defendant's guilty plea, but rather from a separate civil proceeding in which testing, evaluation, a probable cause hearing, and a trial by either the court or jury occurs
- “[A] defendant’s possible commitment under the Sexually Violent Predator Act is a collateral consequence of sentencing pursuant to a guilty plea or a conviction.”
- distinction between direct and collateral consequences of a plea turns on whether the result represents a definite, immediate, and largely automatic effect on the range of the defendants punishment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. HughesIllinois Supreme Court· 2013-03-04· cited 272×
- People v. HarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-02-25· cited 9×
- Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-05-08· cited 5×
- Hiott v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-03-16· cited 4×
- Michael Anderson, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-01-28
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-17· cited 485×
- Joseph F. Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionFourth Circuit· 1973-04-06· cited 222×
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 215×
- State v. GasterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 178×
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-05-13· cited 153×
- Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-04· cited 86×
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 84×
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-10· cited 75×
- In Re the Care & Treatment of MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-23· cited 55×
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-29· cited 52×
- Osprey, Inc. v. Cabana Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-15· cited 43×
- Harres v. LeekeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-07-24· cited 26×
- Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-11· cited 24×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of PaschkeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-02-08· cited 20×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-09· cited 20×
- Pearman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-05· cited 14×
- Bussell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-08-21· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.