Hamm v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “rationale under Padilla does not extend to a person’s civil commitment under the [Sexually Violent Predator] Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Roberts
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-07-30· cited 26×
• In the Matter of Jeffrey Allen Chapman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-02-15· cited 14×
• Lucero v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-09-09
• In re Tellez
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-10-18

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Teague v. Lane
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
• Padilla v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 2010-03-31· cited 5,017×
• Chaidez v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-02-20· cited 962×
• Butler v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-06-20· cited 44×
• Gibson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-12· cited 41×
• McWee v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-01-27· cited 9×
• Care and Treatment of Beaver v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-27· cited 9×
• Williams v. Ozmint
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-12-22· cited 8×
• Page v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-13· cited 7×