N.D. Alabama· 8/22/2012
Page v. Regions Bank
Citations
- 917 F. Supp. 2d 1214
- 2012 WL 6913593
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185440
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding plaintiff had TCPA standing even though number was registered in someone else’s name because he was the cell phone’s “regular user and carrier”
- applying the rule of last antecedent to find “charged for the call” only applied to “any service”
- rejecting argument that only “called party” has standing after finding “no limitation in the text of the statute to indicate that only a ‘called party’ may assert a TCPA claim”
- “[T]he Leyse court cites § 227(b)(3) for the proposition that ‘[a] called party who receives such a call is permitted to bring suit to collect $500 in statutory damages.’ As explained above, the term ‘called party’ does not even appear in § 227(b)(3
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Acker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Leyse v. Bank of America National Ass'nThird Circuit· 2015-10-14· cited 134×
- Manno v. Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLCS.D. Florida· 2013-03-26· cited 46×
- Greenley v. Laborers' International UnionD. Minnesota· 2017-09-19· cited 11×
- Thomas v. Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corp.C.D. California· 2015-08-05· cited 7×
- Fini v. Dish Network L.L.C.M.D. Florida· 2013-03-06· cited 7×
- Moore v. Dish Network L.L.C.N.D. West Virginia· 2014-10-15· cited 5×
- Gesten v. Stewart Law Group, LLCS.D. Florida· 2014-12-19· cited 3×
- Christopher Brown and Carrie Brown v. Enterprise Recovery Systems, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-08-22
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co.Eleventh Circuit· 1999-02-22· cited 1,598×
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 843×
- Maya v. Centex Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2011-09-21· cited 547×
- United States v. HayesSupreme Court· 2009-02-24· cited 322×
- United States v. Gold Star Medical ServicesEleventh Circuit· 1999-07-14· cited 163×
- Bingham, Ltd. v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1984-02-09· cited 82×
- Soppet v. ENHANCED RECOVERY CO., LLCSeventh Circuit· 2012-05-11· cited 64×
- Dennis Hardy v. Regions Mortgage, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2006-05-26· cited 56×
- Harris v. World Financial Network National BankE.D. Michigan· 2012-04-03· cited 14×
- D.G. Ex Rel. Tang v. William W. Siegel & AssociatesN.D. Illinois· 2011-06-14· cited 13×
- Kopff v. World Research Group, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2008-08-01· cited 11×
- Cook Oil Co., Inc. v. United StatesM.D. Alabama· 1996-03-20· cited 5×
- Osorio v. State Farm Bank, F.S.B.S.D. Florida· 2012-05-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.