· 3/6/2013
Fini v. Dish Network L.L.C.
Citations
- 955 F. Supp. 2d 1288
- 2013 WL 3815627
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101829
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there is no provision in Federal Rules providing for disqualification where expert has consulted with other side
- no pro vision in Federal Rules providing for disqualification where expert has consulted with other side
- “[t]he mere payment for consulting time does not make an expert per se a ‘retained’ expert”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.