Dennis Hardy v. Regions Mortgage, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there is no private right of action to challenge a violation of 24 C.F.R. § 3500.17 because it was promulgated under § 10 of RESPA
• holding that 12 U.S.C. § 2609 provides no private right of action
• concluding under the language of § 3500.17 that a violation of the regulation is a violation of Section 10 of RESPA
• finding that a failure to comply with 24 C.F.R. § 3500.17 is a violation of RESPA Section 10, and violations of Section 10 are only enforceable by the HUD Secretary
• noting that there is no private right of action for certain RESPA violations
• determining that a failure to comply with 12 C.F.R. § 3500.17(o), which was later recodified at 12 C.F.R. § 1024.17, “is a violation of RESPA § 10, and RESPA explicitly states that the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development enforces violations of § 10”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).