Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. State

Citations

  • 18 S.W.3d 228
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54
  • 2000 WL 628317

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a jury charge was inappropriate because it expanded on the definition of “intoxicated” as set forth in the information
  • holding that a jury charge was inappropriate because it expanded on the definition of “intoxicated” as set forth in the charging instrument
  • holding that a jury charge was inappropriate because it expanded on the definition of \intoxicated\ as set forth in the information
  • concluding conviction not authorized on theory not alleged in charging instrument
  • indictment authorizing conviction for intoxication “with alcohol” did not authorize conviction for alternative theory by means of “alcohol, a drug, or a combination”
  • conviction was not authorized on a theory that was not alleged in the charging instrument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Meyers, Holland, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, McCormick, Mansfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.