O'Sullivan v. Felix
Citations
- 233 U.S. 318
- 34 S. Ct. 596
- 58 L. Ed. 980
- 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1249
Syllabus
<p>That an action depends upon, or arises under, the laws of the United States, does not preclude the application of the statute of limitations of the State. McLaine v. Rankin, 197 U. S. 154.</p> <p>An action brought in the state court for damages for personal assault against persons violating Rev. Stat., §§ 5508 and 5509, is not an action for penalties but for remedial damages, and the period of prescription depends upon the law of the State. Rev. Stat., § 1047, does not apply.</p> <p>The criminal proceedings and punishment for public wrongs provided by Rev. Stat., §§ 1979-1981 and 5510 and the actions in law and equity for the redress of private injuries resulting from violations of laws of the United States also provided by §§ 1979-1981 are distinct.</p> <p>The term “penalty” involves the idea of punishment for infraction of the law and includes any extraordinary liability to which the law subjects a wrongdoer in favor, of the person wronged, not limited to the damages suffered; while in a civil suit the amount of recovery for such damages is determined by the extent of the injury received and the elements constituting it. •</p>
Judges: McKenna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
211 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court· 1985-04-17· cited 4,134×
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court· 1975-05-19· cited 2,546×
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court· 1971-12-06· cited 2,532×
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court· 1942-03-30· cited 1,648×
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,391×
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court· 1980-05-19· cited 1,250×
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court· 1943-01-18· cited 1,062×
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 980×
- Occidental Life Insurance v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 701×
- Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 697×
- Burnett v. GrattanSupreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 447×
- Tony Fisher v. Jordan HollingsworthThird Circuit· 2024-08-15· cited 433×
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1976-10-20· cited 360×
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenNinth Circuit· 1959-05-28· cited 349×
- Timothy M. Burgh v. Borough Council of the Borough of Montrose Timothy BurghThird Circuit· 2001-05-25· cited 321×
- 5 Fair empl.prac.cas. 587, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8460 United States of America v. Georgia Power Company, Charles King v. Georgia Power CompanyFifth Circuit· 1973-03-16· cited 318×
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court· 1926-11-22· cited 300×
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court· 1915-02-23· cited 271×
- Hattie Brazier v. W. B. CherryFifth Circuit· 1961-07-28· cited 226×
- Williams v. HorvathCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-05-04· cited 216×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named O'Sullivan v. Felix
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.